1 00:00:02,780 --> 00:00:07,910 And I will also intervene three minutes before the talk to the end of the talk. 2 00:00:07,940 --> 00:00:08,480 Thank you. 3 00:00:11,030 --> 00:00:14,540 Thank you very much. Can you hear me? Yes. 4 00:00:14,890 --> 00:00:18,580 Okay, great. Can you see my slides here? Sure. 5 00:00:20,510 --> 00:00:25,910 I am very happy to be presenting the status of CMS with some perspectives and 6 00:00:26,900 --> 00:00:29,120 and some new results. 7 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:31,250 See? 8 00:00:32,990 --> 00:00:38,660 And So who are we we're the CMS collaboration. We're now 237 Institute's 9 00:00:38,660 --> 00:00:44,810 in 55 countries. And when I was preparing this talk, I was thinking, we're in 2020. 10 00:00:44,810 --> 00:00:49,670 And maybe 2020 is a little different than what we had expected. But one of the 11 00:00:49,670 --> 00:00:54,560 things that you know, we celebrated this year was, this was since the last lacp. We 12 00:00:54,560 --> 00:01:02,720 have the 10th anniversary of collisions, you know, at CMS and at the LSE. So We had 13 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:06,410 wanted to have a party at our last collaboration meeting, but we have a 14 00:01:06,410 --> 00:01:15,230 virtual on toast to the LMC instead. And looking back in what else has happened 15 00:01:15,230 --> 00:01:19,340 over the last year, we had our collaboration meeting in Thailand where we 16 00:01:19,580 --> 00:01:25,880 many of us got to meet or boil Highness The princess of Thailand during our CMS 17 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:32,300 week. That seems like a very long time ago. So we have lots of plans coming for 18 00:01:32,540 --> 00:01:37,310 2020 we were in the middle of completing the long shutdown work very much in the 19 00:01:37,310 --> 00:01:41,600 middle of it and everything was making good progress. Preparing for run three and 20 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:49,310 I highlight here on the side on the work we've been doing to try to include GPUs in 21 00:01:49,310 --> 00:01:56,360 the HL T and trying to figure out how to make that improvements in in the online 22 00:01:56,360 --> 00:02:04,340 new construction to take advantage of the GPS And, of course, preparing for the HSC 23 00:02:04,340 --> 00:02:11,840 and getting ready for conferences and publishing papers. And But, as you will 24 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:16,160 know, things are a little bit different than what we had planned for. And we're, 25 00:02:16,610 --> 00:02:19,790 at the end of February, really 26 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:22,330 took a deep breath and 27 00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:27,830 looked at the situation and we moved I know all our meetings to virtual like 28 00:02:27,830 --> 00:02:31,250 we're doing for this conference in the beginning of March, and had a big 29 00:02:31,250 --> 00:02:36,410 collaboration meeting at the end of March, which went well. We put CMS into safe mode 30 00:02:36,410 --> 00:02:45,290 and everyone started teleworking. And right now we're very much in the startup 31 00:02:45,290 --> 00:02:51,800 phase again and doing the slow restart. We've warmed up the magnet, and we're 32 00:02:52,610 --> 00:02:58,790 bringing back the laboratories on the CERN site, and you know, where most people are 33 00:02:58,790 --> 00:03:03,710 still teleworking. Of course is a world situation not just the same situation. But 34 00:03:03,710 --> 00:03:12,590 this is where we are at this point of trying to work on me getting back to work 35 00:03:12,590 --> 00:03:16,760 as much as we can but maintaining sort of the priority of the health and safety of 36 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:21,830 all the people and I think was mentioned before, that is their discussion of the 37 00:03:21,830 --> 00:03:30,590 schedule on Juni. So, just a quick overview of what's been going on in LS to 38 00:03:30,590 --> 00:03:36,200 where last year we did a lot of work on the new ons and with h Cal where we 39 00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:43,880 finished up the phase one upgrades of the of the readout and immune systems we've 40 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:50,540 been doing work which is more related towards HL hc and even have installed our 41 00:03:50,540 --> 00:03:57,680 first level first phase two detector, the one layer of the of the G of the john 42 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:03,440 chambers. The second one is to be installed later. So things are, as has 43 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:07,850 been mentioned before, of course have been delayed since since March but we're 44 00:04:07,850 --> 00:04:11,990 getting back to it and we'll be working on you know, completing all the Milan 45 00:04:11,990 --> 00:04:20,060 upgrades the beam pipe installation, and preparing to put in the pixels with a new 46 00:04:20,300 --> 00:04:26,000 layer one pixel detector. And, and of course, we're reevaluating that schedule 47 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:30,500 right now. So let's move on to some physics results in here. I'm trying to 48 00:04:30,500 --> 00:04:34,040 give a highlight of recent results. So it'll be sort of 49 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:40,190 rush through many of our recent 50 00:04:41,660 --> 00:04:45,380 analyses that have come out for this conference or in the last few months. 51 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:56,690 We are poised to reach our one milestone of 1000 papers overall where we have about 52 00:04:56,690 --> 00:05:02,720 we have 969 papers submitted on collect data. And we had hoped to have a party at 53 00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:08,690 the next collaboration meeting to celebrate the 1,000th paper but we'll have 54 00:05:08,690 --> 00:05:14,120 to be doing that virtually or in person in some leader to. And I just point out that 55 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:19,280 the LFC club races have gotten to be very experts in machine learning. In fact, two 56 00:05:19,280 --> 00:05:23,120 of our papers have been published or accepted for publication and machine 57 00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:24,080 learning journals. 58 00:05:26,990 --> 00:05:27,620 So the first 59 00:05:29,510 --> 00:05:38,180 result of highlight is the first observation visa vest x 3872 five decay 60 00:05:38,180 --> 00:05:47,480 mode. And this is of course, x 3872 is an interesting state that people have want to 61 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:52,940 learn more about and so we've been looking at how it's produced for raid decays of 62 00:05:52,940 --> 00:06:01,940 different behead bronze and here, we look at the ratio with respect to age This 63 00:06:01,970 --> 00:06:09,830 production of the SDK with respect to a normalization channel, which is the side 64 00:06:09,830 --> 00:06:15,740 to s channel. And the top plots here are the this reference channel on the bottom 65 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:21,770 is for the signal to be submitted to x 3872 five, and we measure this ratio. And 66 00:06:21,770 --> 00:06:26,630 what's interesting to see here is that this measure sort of wrenching ratio 67 00:06:26,660 --> 00:06:37,070 fraction for B sub s is similar to the one for B zero, but only about half of the one 68 00:06:37,190 --> 00:06:39,470 four for the B plus and 69 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:42,140 that's 70 00:06:43,790 --> 00:06:45,260 something to be followed up on 71 00:06:47,330 --> 00:06:53,300 here. So another measurement is tough work Cal Cal are compelling coming from Tiki 72 00:06:53,300 --> 00:06:58,040 Bar dialect on a case. And here we make use of the effects of virtual Higgs boson 73 00:06:58,310 --> 00:07:03,320 exchange on Monday. To bar kinematics to extract information about the coupling 74 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:09,140 strength from the kinematic distributions, and so these events are to leptons was to 75 00:07:09,140 --> 00:07:15,230 be jets. And it's this is from the full run to data sample. And you can see in the 76 00:07:15,230 --> 00:07:22,730 leftmost plot sort of the sensitivity of this coupling strengths as compared to the 77 00:07:22,730 --> 00:07:33,680 standard model of value. And this is the plot for the for the mass of the and then 78 00:07:33,710 --> 00:07:40,610 here is the likelihood scan from the fit. And then the once you make the fit in have 79 00:07:40,610 --> 00:07:46,280 the the best fit value, you comparing the data of Monte Carlo for this and you've 80 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:47,060 been able to 81 00:07:49,190 --> 00:07:50,510 determine the 82 00:07:53,390 --> 00:07:59,480 coupling strength with setting a limit where it's going to be less than 1.62 or 83 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:04,430 the measurement of 1.16 plus point two four minus point three six. And this 84 00:08:04,460 --> 00:08:09,230 measurement is sort of an alternative to the Tth method, which assumes other 85 00:08:09,230 --> 00:08:09,920 additional 86 00:08:11,180 --> 00:08:13,010 Standard Model were engineering issues. 87 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:23,140 So all highlights of this year is sort of multi bows on production and you hear me 88 00:08:23,140 --> 00:08:27,610 look at the tribals on production and look tonic final states. And this is the first 89 00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:32,620 observation of tribals on production. It's a full run to analysis we're looking at 90 00:08:32,680 --> 00:08:41,290 you know, three to six leptons or two same charge, leptons plus two jets. And it was 91 00:08:41,290 --> 00:08:47,950 done in two analyses both the cut base and DDT analysis. And of course, there are 92 00:08:47,950 --> 00:08:52,810 several categories defined to optimize the sensitivity and you see this sort of data 93 00:08:52,810 --> 00:08:59,800 versus Monte Carlo expectations in all the categories here in the same charge three 94 00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:05,020 laptops, In four or five, six leptons. In the end, the results are consistent with 95 00:09:05,020 --> 00:09:11,860 the standard model and the triples on production is observed with 5.7 standard 96 00:09:11,860 --> 00:09:19,780 deviations or 5.9 was expected. And also individually, there's evidence for the www 97 00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:22,360 production and WWE production 98 00:09:23,620 --> 00:09:24,160 where 99 00:09:26,860 --> 00:09:31,270 you can see the results in this plot and also in the table over here. 100 00:09:34,910 --> 00:09:40,400 We've also been looking at vector bows on scattering die bows on production where 101 00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:46,160 you're looking for two forward jets and two, two bosons in the central region. And 102 00:09:46,160 --> 00:09:54,530 here we have new results in in z and w gamma, where we have the first observation 103 00:09:54,560 --> 00:10:01,970 of electro reproduction of W gamma with an observed two Difference of 5.3 standard 104 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:09,260 deviations with the expected was 4.8. And this was done with combining the results 105 00:10:09,260 --> 00:10:16,580 from 2016 with ATV results previously published, and obviously that the 106 00:10:16,580 --> 00:10:21,320 challenges here are the small cross sections. But we've now made measurements 107 00:10:21,380 --> 00:10:29,900 of the same side WW, the W z, and we have evidence for for z z and have used these 108 00:10:29,900 --> 00:10:37,820 to set limits on an almost quarter gauge couplings. Were here you see the mass plot 109 00:10:37,820 --> 00:10:45,290 for W gamma. The limits are how you set the constraints. And here I've quoted some 110 00:10:45,290 --> 00:10:52,430 of the limits where the sensitivities are particularly good in ta in T nine. And 111 00:10:52,430 --> 00:10:57,650 here you see the evidence for for the zz production 112 00:10:59,330 --> 00:10:59,870 in the middle 113 00:11:04,670 --> 00:11:11,030 also made measurements of TT h or h goes to gamma gamma and its CP structure were 114 00:11:11,030 --> 00:11:16,700 hydronic and atonic topic caeser are addressed and BDT is used to categorize 115 00:11:16,700 --> 00:11:21,800 the events. The signal is extracted from the simultaneous fit in all categories. 116 00:11:22,190 --> 00:11:28,520 And for the CP studies the categories are defined using vt and CP discriminant zero. 117 00:11:28,820 --> 00:11:38,150 So, here we have observed TT TT h h gamma gamma is observed at 6.6 sigma and the 118 00:11:38,150 --> 00:11:43,700 pure CP odd coupling is excluded at 3.2 sigma 119 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:52,420 also made measurements of 120 00:11:54,080 --> 00:12:00,020 that differential Tiki Bar cross sections were on the production cross sections for 121 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:07,250 PT top pairs and we require you one to be a hydronic top two k which is 122 00:12:07,250 --> 00:12:13,280 characterized by a large radius jet with PT greater than 400 gV. And the second one 123 00:12:13,730 --> 00:12:20,990 is either another large radius jet. So that's an all hydronic decay or, or you 124 00:12:20,990 --> 00:12:26,660 love the top to be electronic decay. And we present the results it's a particle 125 00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:32,510 level where I have those plots here. And here for the electronic channel, I have 126 00:12:32,510 --> 00:12:39,830 the parts on level and in from looking at these and comparing the distributions to 127 00:12:39,830 --> 00:12:44,510 theoretical models, we find that the absolute cross sections that are measured 128 00:12:44,510 --> 00:12:51,770 are lower than then the predictions from the models and but the normalized 129 00:12:51,770 --> 00:12:54,530 distributions as well. 130 00:13:01,900 --> 00:13:06,580 Moving on is another one that uses of substructure as a search for boosted 131 00:13:06,580 --> 00:13:12,910 Hagen's came to BP bar. This is an inclusive search and we look for Higgs 132 00:13:13,210 --> 00:13:19,780 bars a single large radius yet and here we divide the events into six PT categories 133 00:13:19,780 --> 00:13:31,240 between 450 and 1200 gV. The selection uses substructure and double B tagging and 134 00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:37,480 the signal strength is a fit to the things that don't pass the fail the B tag and 135 00:13:39,100 --> 00:13:43,450 pass the the B tag and bend in 136 00:13:45,170 --> 00:13:51,680 the massive Sapa soft rock mouse in the PT and here we measure the signal strength of 137 00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:59,000 any see it here in the in the green in the green band and the various according to 138 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:00,140 various speeches. 139 00:14:07,820 --> 00:14:12,980 So moving on with her things that you use of jet substructure, we did a search for 140 00:14:12,980 --> 00:14:18,830 Suzy and boosted debose ons pleasant that were here it's a search for two highly 141 00:14:18,830 --> 00:14:26,600 boosting z bozos decaying into headwinds as Matt B uses wide cone jets with nos 142 00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:32,630 compatible with the Z. Again we're using the full run to data sample and here we 143 00:14:32,630 --> 00:14:41,900 can set limits on the Gleaner mouse example 1920 gV is excluded at the at the 144 00:14:41,900 --> 00:14:43,970 95% confidence level, but 145 00:14:50,450 --> 00:14:53,870 we've also done a lot of work in looking at long for long lift particles and this 146 00:14:53,870 --> 00:15:02,540 is the result looking in displays jets where the search is for displaced tracks 147 00:15:02,540 --> 00:15:10,940 in a digest system. And here we've done this analysis using the 2017 2018 analysis 148 00:15:10,940 --> 00:15:15,980 and then combined for the results with 2016. Of course, we're looking for 149 00:15:16,010 --> 00:15:25,250 displays for vertices very high purity tracks. And this is something that is used 150 00:15:25,250 --> 00:15:33,740 to set limits on many, many models. I just put them several of them here in diagrams, 151 00:15:34,010 --> 00:15:40,730 and if you set the in simplified jet jet model, you can see the limits here, where 152 00:15:40,820 --> 00:15:47,030 this is going from one millimeter up to 10 meters, and we're excluding and gluing it 153 00:15:47,030 --> 00:15:54,410 Galena masses are less than 2450 for detail from six to 500 millimeters, for 154 00:15:54,410 --> 00:15:59,630 example, and then also a limit on stop masses. Here we have to Vito in this for 155 00:15:59,630 --> 00:16:03,980 this analysis. As you know the structure of the of the pixel detector to make sure 156 00:16:03,980 --> 00:16:11,900 that we're not including any nuclear interactions, this analysis we also did a 157 00:16:11,900 --> 00:16:17,450 search for disappearing tracks at 13. tv which is search for long live charged 158 00:16:17,450 --> 00:16:21,440 particles that decay within the tracker. So we look for something in the silicon 159 00:16:21,440 --> 00:16:25,280 tracker where you have a track and then missing out or hits and then nothing in 160 00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:33,170 the kilometers. And this is where you can see here the set limits are excluded up to 161 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:41,450 884 gV for the lifetime of three nanoseconds for using this kind of search. 162 00:16:45,020 --> 00:16:50,450 We've also done a search for direct stop pair production on the thigh leptons. And 163 00:16:50,450 --> 00:16:56,660 here we're looking for two opposite sign up tons of B jets and met and once again, 164 00:16:56,660 --> 00:17:02,030 the results here are consistent with the expected background. And they can be 165 00:17:02,030 --> 00:17:07,880 interpreted in, in several simplified models. Here you see the comparison data 166 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:14,120 Monte Carlo. And then you see the limits in this simple model here with a stop to 167 00:17:15,860 --> 00:17:23,330 do a top neutralino. And you see this is analysis as the in purple, where this, the 168 00:17:23,330 --> 00:17:28,190 strength of this analysis is coming from these cascade decays, which you see up 169 00:17:28,190 --> 00:17:34,190 here, where you can set much higher limits, going up to 1.4, gv, and up to 900 170 00:17:34,790 --> 00:17:45,530 gV for the lightest neutrally. Switching back to we were looking at last year, the 171 00:17:45,530 --> 00:17:52,700 first run to result we had from CNS was his observation of the, the double peak of 172 00:17:52,700 --> 00:18:00,170 excited, he succeeds. And here, we actually look back at this and do this 173 00:18:00,650 --> 00:18:09,680 measurement of the cross section ratios of measuring the the B sub c to s relative to 174 00:18:09,680 --> 00:18:15,980 the BC and measure these, these ratios, and then the ratio of ratios between these 175 00:18:15,980 --> 00:18:16,760 two states 176 00:18:17,420 --> 00:18:22,220 two or three minutes before the end of your talk, thank you. 177 00:18:24,920 --> 00:18:35,840 And then you also have a measurement of CP violating phase five is in BC best JCI kk. 178 00:18:36,230 --> 00:18:36,770 And 179 00:18:38,180 --> 00:18:39,110 this is a 180 00:18:40,640 --> 00:18:45,530 time to find clever tag Angular analysis using a dedicated trigger and it includes 181 00:18:45,530 --> 00:18:51,920 the 2017 and 2018 data, but also has an improved opposite side tagging mechanism 182 00:18:51,920 --> 00:18:59,330 with tagging method using machine learning techniques and it's a substantial 183 00:18:59,330 --> 00:19:03,830 improvement on the Compared to our ATV measurement, where you see the ATV 184 00:19:03,830 --> 00:19:11,090 measurement here, and then the this is the 13th ci measurement and the red is the 185 00:19:11,120 --> 00:19:22,430 combined CMS measure. And finally, we have evidence for the top pair production in 186 00:19:22,730 --> 00:19:28,490 red lead conditions that was came out several months ago. And this is the first 187 00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:33,410 set of strong evidence for top Quark pair production and live lead and it follows 188 00:19:33,410 --> 00:19:39,710 the first observation that was done in p lead previously in 2017. 189 00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:52,220 So, well in the last few minutes that I have, I thought that I would talk a little 190 00:19:52,220 --> 00:19:54,590 bit about the future and 191 00:19:57,170 --> 00:20:05,060 show you what our upgrades were. We been busy over, getting ready for only 413. But 192 00:20:05,060 --> 00:20:11,840 getting ready for the HL hc. And this year, we've produced a new TDR on 193 00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:16,940 describing our level one trigger and then looking forward to TDR for next year while 194 00:20:16,940 --> 00:20:27,500 I'm on it h o t and DAC. So this is a sort of outline of the full upgrade. It's, it's 195 00:20:28,520 --> 00:20:34,670 lots of nice detector technology, things are going well so far we've also been 196 00:20:34,670 --> 00:20:39,470 looking at an improvement for the Ford system that precision proton spectrometer 197 00:20:39,470 --> 00:20:44,990 known as PPS where we have an expression of interest which has been completed and 198 00:20:44,990 --> 00:20:48,920 is circulating in the collaboration. What you see here on the right is what the 199 00:20:48,920 --> 00:20:52,490 upgrade people have been doing over the last few months has been read doing the 200 00:20:52,490 --> 00:20:57,110 schedule and this is their schedule for each of the sub detectors which I will 201 00:20:57,260 --> 00:21:02,570 show you in great detail, but I will show you that we have been evaluating the 202 00:21:02,570 --> 00:21:07,340 schedule. This is of course pre COVID. So went through every sub detector every 203 00:21:07,340 --> 00:21:13,130 design for the the upgrades, and to making sure that we could get to installation and 204 00:21:13,250 --> 00:21:20,630 commissioning during LS three, and get ready for the run for. So this is this has 205 00:21:20,630 --> 00:21:26,150 been a lot of work and now we're going to be revising it as we learned about the 206 00:21:26,150 --> 00:21:34,070 impacts of code. So as I said that there's a TDR coming for the hlt and DAC and also 207 00:21:34,070 --> 00:21:39,470 for Braille for the luminosity monitor. It's coming in 2021. And then after that, 208 00:21:39,500 --> 00:21:47,480 we'll be working on the computing technologies. So just a won't go through 209 00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:50,690 all of this but this shows you that there's been a lot of technical progress 210 00:21:50,690 --> 00:21:57,020 going on here with the tracker on. And on many trackers tracker or several outer 211 00:21:57,020 --> 00:22:02,930 tracker modules were built for the test feed There's outer sensor production, 212 00:22:02,960 --> 00:22:08,600 battery tracker sensor production going on, and Hamamatsu. And we're currently 213 00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:13,880 building an order of 100 pixel modules for system tests. And for the Ford color 214 00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:18,530 emitter, there's lots of work, understanding meeting centers and getting 215 00:22:18,530 --> 00:22:25,460 the final prototypes ready for the barrel, calorimeter electronics catches in hand 216 00:22:25,850 --> 00:22:33,800 and the other chip, like DTU is submission is imminent. For the timing detector, the 217 00:22:34,490 --> 00:22:41,180 barrel a stick is back from the foundry. And the first gen prototype for the layer 218 00:22:41,180 --> 00:22:46,400 which is me called me zero is the first prototype module. You can see it here in 219 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:51,140 this picture. So there's also getting ready for procurements of silicon sensors 220 00:22:51,140 --> 00:22:55,730 and materials. And it has all happened over the last few months, some of them 221 00:22:55,910 --> 00:23:02,330 virtual review. So I wanted to end with this That just to leave you saying that 222 00:23:02,330 --> 00:23:07,670 CMS have been progressing well and on time with our LS two activities, we were and 223 00:23:07,670 --> 00:23:11,840 had completed several very important goals, which is, each Cal upgrade was 224 00:23:11,840 --> 00:23:16,700 completed and the first gem disk was installed. Before we moved into safe mode 225 00:23:16,700 --> 00:23:23,720 in mid March concern, worldwide work life has not been business as usual. We 226 00:23:23,750 --> 00:23:27,230 management have been very impressed by the resilience of our collaborators and their 227 00:23:27,230 --> 00:23:30,950 willingness to support each other, as we all support our families, friends and 228 00:23:30,950 --> 00:23:36,230 community. I think we've learned learned how to telework and even how to be better 229 00:23:36,230 --> 00:23:40,880 global collaborators through this. It is not yet clear how this will really shape 230 00:23:40,880 --> 00:23:46,040 our work in the future. Research is underway at CERN with critical oils to 231 00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:53,270 activities and upgrade tasks moving ahead on site. But as you can see that many many 232 00:23:53,270 --> 00:23:56,780 activities including lots of physics analysis, which I showed here, are 233 00:23:56,780 --> 00:24:01,520 happening through teleworking, and this we want Make a big thank you to all our 234 00:24:01,520 --> 00:24:06,350 students, postdocs, faculty, scientific staff, computing experts, engineers, 235 00:24:06,350 --> 00:24:11,600 technicians, admins, everyone else for really being able to make this happen. And 236 00:24:12,230 --> 00:24:15,380 we're very excited to present our results this week, you're going to hear a lot more 237 00:24:15,380 --> 00:24:20,120 detail on many of the things I talked about from other speakers. And we have 238 00:24:20,120 --> 00:24:22,940 ambitious plans for three and beyond. Thank you. 239 00:24:25,430 --> 00:24:31,370 Thank you, Patricia, for this very nice talk. And I think we have one question 240 00:24:31,400 --> 00:24:32,780 from Mark. 241 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:34,970 So 242 00:24:36,710 --> 00:24:37,370 okay. 243 00:24:40,490 --> 00:24:45,680 Hello, do you hear something? Yes, we hear you. So you pitch that it's about pitch 10 244 00:24:55,370 --> 00:24:56,810 and get back there, I will get there. 245 00:24:57,800 --> 00:24:58,910 So pitch 10 246 00:25:01,340 --> 00:25:06,920 Values question which is equivalent to if you could give some commands on the 247 00:25:06,920 --> 00:25:13,610 following. So, was the correlation between the two variables quantified? Is the 2d 248 00:25:13,610 --> 00:25:22,040 PDF genuine or easy to produce of one DPF? And if not, it means if you did a project, 249 00:25:22,430 --> 00:25:26,750 or was a coalition consider between the two variables. Thank you. 250 00:25:30,170 --> 00:25:33,200 Okay, I'm not sure I have the answer to those questions. 251 00:25:35,840 --> 00:25:39,080 Maybe we can take that offline or maybe there's someone who's 252 00:25:42,710 --> 00:25:47,270 maybe another diesels this one. Well, there is one person who raised his hand 253 00:25:47,300 --> 00:25:51,890 Wolfgang maybe knows the question, but the answer here it's a quick please because 254 00:25:51,890 --> 00:25:57,050 this can be an oar in the barrel position. Imagine it would be presented. Yeah. It 255 00:25:57,050 --> 00:26:02,270 has been factorized and has been verified that this is Decision advocate approach. 256 00:26:05,900 --> 00:26:12,110 Okay, so you can certainly talk offline or around the parallel session. We have time 257 00:26:12,110 --> 00:26:14,540 for maybe one more question.