1
00:00:01,050 --> 00:00:06,210
Here we go. can I say? Yes, please go
ahead when you're ready. Okay, great.

2
00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:12,420
Yeah. So good morning everyone. I'm here
today to present to you results from lacp

3
00:00:12,420 --> 00:00:22,560
on multiple sites have been in production
of the KC one 372. Yeah, so the KC one 372

4
00:00:22,590 --> 00:00:26,760
or the X is I'm gonna call it during my
talk is an exotic drone. It was first

5
00:00:26,760 --> 00:00:32,700
observed some 20 years ago by the bell
experiment. So, the bell did was to look

6
00:00:32,700 --> 00:00:39,240
at the spectra of j Psy D pi. And as you
can see here on this plot on derived from

7
00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:43,740
the the case of the beholder, and what
they saw in the vicinity of decided speak

8
00:00:43,740 --> 00:00:49,890
as well decide to speak this nice topic
that you may see here and Steinle to be at

9
00:00:49,890 --> 00:00:58,290
a bit higher mass which they named x. So
our agenda X was believed to be another

10
00:00:58,290 --> 00:00:59,970
convention which harmonium stayed by

11
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:06,390
option has been since ruled out as the
Wonder numbers of X has been determined to

12
00:01:06,390 --> 00:01:11,160
be one plus plus. And this makes it
inconsistent with like

13
00:01:12,570 --> 00:01:17,490
with the convention ceremonial because
there's no state expected close to the

14
00:01:17,490 --> 00:01:18,570
mass of dx.

15
00:01:20,310 --> 00:01:28,020
So till now, the nature of x is still a
mystery and we have several possible

16
00:01:28,020 --> 00:01:30,630
hypotheses or theories that are

17
00:01:33,330 --> 00:01:37,860
trying to guess what its nature. So for
instance, there's some papers saying that

18
00:01:37,860 --> 00:01:43,830
it could be a compact multicore. Or for
instance, 100 terminal that's Chairman in

19
00:01:43,830 --> 00:01:52,440
core or abetted by a flavor by by flavor,
light flavor corks or a hydrogen molecule

20
00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,230
or of course, a combination of these days.

21
00:01:57,330 --> 00:01:59,970
So under recent years, and the high
multiplicity of

22
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:04,080
Number one collisions we have seen many
phenomenon that we know from clerical

23
00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:10,680
isms, such as some structures and I have
done correlations. As you can see on this

24
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:11,700
plot on the left.

25
00:02:13,469 --> 00:02:19,529
This typical structure such as the eBay
site rage, which are absent in minimum

26
00:02:19,529 --> 00:02:25,439
bias return from data or friends and their
boards. It's an enhancement of traditional

27
00:02:25,469 --> 00:02:26,429
model strange

28
00:02:27,450 --> 00:02:29,880
hydrophones with increasing multiplicity.

29
00:02:31,110 --> 00:02:34,680
So, this means that pigeon pigeon
collisions provide us with another

30
00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:39,840
playground where we can test and try to
understand the nuclear effects of be

31
00:02:39,870 --> 00:02:41,880
observing proton close collisions.

32
00:02:44,190 --> 00:02:49,110
Now, the conventional charmagne has been
long studied nuclear data and we know that

33
00:02:49,110 --> 00:02:54,960
its production is affected by the nuclear
medium. The modification is quantified by

34
00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:59,790
the so called macro modification factor
which is defined on the slide here.

35
00:03:00,630 --> 00:03:08,130
And is pretty much defined as the as the
production and production close collisions

36
00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:11,880
normalized by the production and
production freedom scaled by the atomic

37
00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:12,990
number of new clothes.

38
00:03:14,309 --> 00:03:21,599
As a bigger modification for ammonia at
LSE is shown on the plot on the right,

39
00:03:21,629 --> 00:03:23,909
where as a function of our ability,

40
00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:31,440
we can see the modification for j psi in
red and for Sagittarius in black. And so,

41
00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:35,970
the first thing you might notice is that
these teacher Moana have a different

42
00:03:36,180 --> 00:03:41,730
separation pattern where the Chase is a
preset for traffic at about a ratio is

43
00:03:41,730 --> 00:03:46,710
consistent with the energetic rapidity.
While for decider is that we see a similar

44
00:03:46,710 --> 00:03:52,350
level of separation that's stronger than
that for the chase. I have both

45
00:03:52,350 --> 00:03:59,280
repetitiveness Moreover, the chase I can
be described with models containing

46
00:04:01,230 --> 00:04:07,410
Difference initial state ethics that would
affect the CC bar as its production, but

47
00:04:07,590 --> 00:04:12,240
these models fail to describe the
sideways. So, if it was really an initial

48
00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:12,750
state

49
00:04:14,580 --> 00:04:18,810
it should it should be affected both both
of these states should be affected the

50
00:04:18,810 --> 00:04:23,520
same way So, Geron needs to be some
effects of play that take place at later

51
00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:28,650
stages of the collision. Moreover, looking
at the bottom on our family so this is

52
00:04:28,650 --> 00:04:32,670
shown in these two plots at the bottom
where we have decided to as over

53
00:04:34,980 --> 00:04:40,620
outsiders observe them on as over sold to
us over a wellness there are a lot of

54
00:04:40,620 --> 00:04:43,110
suppression and three years over monos

55
00:04:44,460 --> 00:04:50,760
Yeah, so you can see it for the higher
states do suppression is stronger for the

56
00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:55,920
three years even more pronounced and this
pattern can be described but final stage

57
00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:57,840
ethics such as the commerce model,

58
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:06,300
So now we can take the knowledge of the
metals that we use to probe commercial

59
00:05:06,300 --> 00:05:13,230
Chairman now, such a site as in a nuclear
metric and apply it to the x. And

60
00:05:13,500 --> 00:05:17,640
hopefully by measuring its relative
suppression, for instance, as a function

61
00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:23,040
of multiplicity compared to sideways,
which the case in the same mode, we may

62
00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:28,620
help to learn something about excess
nature. So then what we can expect if x is

63
00:05:28,620 --> 00:05:31,140
a hydronic molecule, so then it means that
it's

64
00:05:32,550 --> 00:05:37,740
the x would be very weakly bound with a
large radius of about transgender meters,

65
00:05:38,010 --> 00:05:43,080
and not be very prone to dissociation. On
the other hand, if x is a compacted

66
00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:43,800
record,

67
00:05:44,820 --> 00:05:49,290
that record we can we can expect it to be
tightly bound and have a small radius and

68
00:05:49,290 --> 00:05:51,150
then it would not dissociate so much.

69
00:05:53,610 --> 00:05:58,470
Moreover, we also need to take into
account where the states that we're

70
00:05:58,800 --> 00:05:59,970
studying was period

71
00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:04,710
produced. So, we have the prime states
that are producing the interation vertex.

72
00:06:04,950 --> 00:06:10,170
And these then may interact with a
creative medium and for instance,

73
00:06:10,230 --> 00:06:14,790
associates have bad interaction with
commerce. On the other hand, we also have

74
00:06:14,790 --> 00:06:19,080
the delight or non prime component where
that originates from the hadrons. And

75
00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:23,910
these can affect by the significant
distance from, from their point of

76
00:06:23,910 --> 00:06:25,470
creation. So then

77
00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:31,770
they don't have stays will decay in vacuum
and should not be affected by the

78
00:06:31,770 --> 00:06:32,430
underlying

79
00:06:35,880 --> 00:06:41,820
oops, so, so the analysis and results that
I'm about to show you has been obtained

80
00:06:41,820 --> 00:06:46,290
with eight of the ICP detector, which is a
single arm spectrometer fully instrumented

81
00:06:46,290 --> 00:06:51,660
for a trap entity, which has been designed
for studies of heavy quarks. As such, ICP

82
00:06:51,660 --> 00:06:55,950
has axon radix and tracking and
indentification capability and can

83
00:06:55,950 --> 00:06:58,860
reconstruct have 100 rounds down to zero
PT

84
00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:03,870
So, some notable systems that has been
used in this analysis is the vertex

85
00:07:03,870 --> 00:07:08,910
locator which is a circle detector
surrounded interaction point and as the

86
00:07:08,910 --> 00:07:16,950
name for such names such as provides
within a day, nobody with a vertex.

87
00:07:18,660 --> 00:07:23,580
They will also enables the separation of
the prompt and on prem component and Roger

88
00:07:23,580 --> 00:07:25,860
hora in this analysis service

89
00:07:27,270 --> 00:07:32,280
allows us to get the activity proxy which
was defined as the number of tracks

90
00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:37,320
reconstructed in below. Then we have a set
of tyrannical detectors downstream and

91
00:07:37,350 --> 00:07:42,510
upstream from the magnet which was used to
identify the pylons and finally the neons

92
00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:46,950
were triggered on and reconstructed with
eight of them in your system.

93
00:07:49,650 --> 00:07:52,800
Now the goal of the analysis was to

94
00:07:53,850 --> 00:07:59,970
calculate a cross section ratio of x
oversight us and four

95
00:08:01,020 --> 00:08:05,610
For both of these to come in is very
constructive terminal spectra of chase AI,

96
00:08:05,940 --> 00:08:11,790
and the Python of which example you can
see here on this right. So we have a nice

97
00:08:11,790 --> 00:08:16,710
tobik for the side us and a tiny home for
the x.

98
00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:22,890
And this picture, as you can see here,
this is a circuit for for turbidity and

99
00:08:22,890 --> 00:08:28,650
for transistors, about five G. Now, to
separate the front and the non prime

100
00:08:28,650 --> 00:08:33,630
component, what was done was to
simultaneously fiddle around mass spectra,

101
00:08:33,900 --> 00:08:38,670
as you can see here, on this example, the
bottom for one of the multiplicity events,

102
00:08:39,060 --> 00:08:43,260
and to see the appropriate time which is
defined as the difference of there's a

103
00:08:43,260 --> 00:08:47,910
component of the DK vertex of the state
that we're looking at and the primary

104
00:08:47,910 --> 00:08:53,580
vertex normalized that is a component of
the momentum of the state and scaled by

105
00:08:53,580 --> 00:08:54,480
its mass.

106
00:08:57,270 --> 00:08:59,970
So after separating the promo known from
gambling

107
00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:05,310
We can compute a fraction of percent x and
North Korean cite us, which is define us

108
00:09:05,340 --> 00:09:10,020
as here as the number of the prim state
over a number of all states. So, the

109
00:09:10,020 --> 00:09:16,650
results as a function of multiplicity are
visible on this plot on the right for x in

110
00:09:16,680 --> 00:09:21,840
blue and for Sagittarius in black. And you
may notice that for both sides, the

111
00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:27,120
friction decreases and multiplicity. Now,
this could be explained with combination

112
00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:33,540
of effects first of which would be that
the non from component has

113
00:09:35,100 --> 00:09:42,060
increased with multiplicity. As with
increased multiplicity, we get harder

114
00:09:42,060 --> 00:09:47,430
events, which means that the probability
of producing a BB bar pair is also

115
00:09:47,430 --> 00:09:52,770
increased. And then this increase the bar
production means more we have drones which

116
00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:58,500
can produce more delay to exorcise
exercises. The other effect would be the

117
00:09:58,500 --> 00:10:00,000
perimeter reduction and decrease

118
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:03,960
With multiplicity and this could be
explained as in

119
00:10:05,549 --> 00:10:12,509
evidence with a higher multiplicity with
high occupancy the states produced at the

120
00:10:12,509 --> 00:10:17,939
interaction at the primary vertex have a
higher probability of being associated

121
00:10:17,939 --> 00:10:18,779
with a

122
00:10:20,370 --> 00:10:26,940
with a by the underlying event while those
that are produced fire right from the

123
00:10:26,940 --> 00:10:29,910
vertex are remain unaffected.

124
00:10:32,340 --> 00:10:39,120
So, now, you have all the components to
compute the cross section ratio So, taking

125
00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:45,960
into account some detector effects and
there is results for different for the

126
00:10:45,960 --> 00:10:49,980
cross section ratio you can see here as a
function of multiple sets of for the

127
00:10:49,980 --> 00:10:56,520
prompt in red and for the non from the
delayed and black. So, let's first have a

128
00:10:56,520 --> 00:11:00,000
look at a perm ratio so the ratio of
principal

129
00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:05,490
Produce x oversight as decreases with
multiplicity. So this means that the

130
00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:10,170
suppression of x is stronger compared to
sideways

131
00:11:11,730 --> 00:11:13,350
with increasing multiplicity,

132
00:11:14,519 --> 00:11:16,049
on the other hand, a non current

133
00:11:17,220 --> 00:11:23,760
ratio, so the trend that you see here is
consistent with a flat distribution, which

134
00:11:23,760 --> 00:11:28,860
would mean that the it's independent of
the multiplicity, which is actually what

135
00:11:28,860 --> 00:11:33,900
we would expect for the states that are
produced far away from the interaction

136
00:11:33,900 --> 00:11:41,280
point. So all in all, the behavior that we
see is consistent with the idea of weakly

137
00:11:41,280 --> 00:11:46,590
bound accidents more dissociated and
suggest it's more tightly bound.

138
00:11:48,960 --> 00:11:54,660
Now unfortunately, there's no finalized
theoretical calculation as of today.

139
00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:56,760
However, there's

140
00:11:59,370 --> 00:12:00,000
there's of course

141
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:01,020
As much effort

142
00:12:02,399 --> 00:12:09,239
in invested in trying to explain the
observed behavior. So one of the one of

143
00:12:09,239 --> 00:12:16,349
the publicly available preliminary results
or results is our work in progress can be

144
00:12:16,349 --> 00:12:21,029
found in lns talk from one of the GSI
virtual from last December

145
00:12:22,260 --> 00:12:28,230
where she tried to study what would be the
scenario in commerce model if the X was a

146
00:12:28,230 --> 00:12:31,620
Miko or a quirk. So,

147
00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:37,980
if x is a molecule, then it should be
dissociated with comoving Metro pretty

148
00:12:37,980 --> 00:12:44,430
much immediately and as you can see on
this screenshot of her slides are added at

149
00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:51,360
about double the average multiplicity you
do not see any x and estates. On the other

150
00:12:51,360 --> 00:12:57,060
hand, if x is a track orc, so then the
suppression is going to be more gradual

151
00:12:57,060 --> 00:12:59,970
that multiplicity and you

152
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:05,820
You can see that the chant, quote,
Abdullah describes the the ICB data much

153
00:13:05,820 --> 00:13:13,200
better. However Also, before we draw too
many conclusions, it's also good to

154
00:13:13,230 --> 00:13:16,980
mention that while the calculations with
numbers are based on number of charged

155
00:13:16,980 --> 00:13:22,980
particles, and now ICB, we're using number
of charged tracks. So we're using a proxy

156
00:13:22,980 --> 00:13:25,350
that's uncorrected for detector effects.
So

157
00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:32,280
we can use it to describe it
qualitatively. quantitatively. Yeah, no,

158
00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:36,570
you have two minutes. Okay, great. Yeah.
So well.

159
00:13:37,950 --> 00:13:42,570
Yeah, so last thing from for me, so I
would like to leave you with a little

160
00:13:42,570 --> 00:13:49,140
teaser for an ongoing analysis of x and
production data at a TV. So here you can

161
00:13:49,140 --> 00:13:55,980
see the nice peaks that we have in Ferber
trap entity and backwards rapidity. And as

162
00:13:55,980 --> 00:13:59,970
you may see, this is the zoom of the
chase.

163
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:05,670
And find spectra around excess miles. And
then both receive a nice little peek above

164
00:14:05,670 --> 00:14:11,550
the combinatorial break around. And this
measurement in particular will add two

165
00:14:11,580 --> 00:14:16,530
additional points to the event activity
axis. So this will allow us to compare

166
00:14:17,760 --> 00:14:24,000
the effects in different systems but in
events with the same multiplicity and also

167
00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:29,250
it will enable us enable us to study the
relative suppression of x as a function of

168
00:14:29,250 --> 00:14:29,910
rapidity.

169
00:14:31,530 --> 00:14:37,230
And this brings me to my conclusion. So to
sum it up. You've seen in recent years the

170
00:14:37,230 --> 00:14:41,370
proton proton collisions provide us with
new insight into nuclear ethics that we

171
00:14:41,370 --> 00:14:45,750
usually measure and proton let's unlock
collisions for the nucleus and nucleus and

172
00:14:45,750 --> 00:14:46,500
cause collisions.

173
00:14:47,910 --> 00:14:52,200
One of typical probes of these effects is
the modification of production of

174
00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:57,630
conventional thermonuclear. However, we
can use the methods and the knowledge that

175
00:14:57,630 --> 00:14:59,970
we have shown this measurement and apply
it

176
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:00,870
To

177
00:15:01,949 --> 00:15:08,729
exotic hydrogen such as is the x and hope
to learn more about its character.

178
00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:15,180
So, in my talk, I shown you results of
measurement of relative suppression of X

179
00:15:15,180 --> 00:15:20,430
overside to s as a function of
multiplicity in proton proton collisions

180
00:15:20,430 --> 00:15:25,980
at 70 v. And we've seen that the ratio of
the prompt states decreases with

181
00:15:26,160 --> 00:15:31,740
multiplicity, while the ratio of the non
prime states seems to be independent on

182
00:15:31,740 --> 00:15:34,440
multiplicity. So this

183
00:15:35,760 --> 00:15:37,230
would mean that the X

184
00:15:38,310 --> 00:15:42,570
is more stronger suppressed and the
conventional side address which indicates

185
00:15:42,570 --> 00:15:44,910
that it's more weakly bound.

186
00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:51,330
Now, there's no final theoretical
calculations However, there's some work in

187
00:15:51,330 --> 00:15:59,970
progress on kumaris calculation, and so
they these parametric equations dictate

188
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:05,640
This favorite scenario where x would be a
pure hydronic. Michael, which is a

189
00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:09,990
conclusion that also supports other
measurements such as the abundance of x

190
00:16:09,990 --> 00:16:14,880
decaying into side to s and gamma measured
with ice.

191
00:16:15,900 --> 00:16:20,370
So yeah, thank you for attention and
hopefully see you later in my Zoom Room.

192
00:16:21,780 --> 00:16:26,580
Great. Thanks so much, Jana for this for
this description of such a beautiful

193
00:16:26,610 --> 00:16:29,010
result that LED TV is produced.

194
00:16:30,030 --> 00:16:33,180
We also really appreciate you being here
because I know it's very early in the

195
00:16:33,180 --> 00:16:39,360
morning regular. Yes. So now we have a
minute or two for a couple of questions on

196
00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:43,950
Yanis presentation. So if you have any
questions, please use the raised hand

197
00:16:43,950 --> 00:16:46,050
button in zoom and then we can call on
you.

198
00:16:54,900 --> 00:16:57,120
Hello, Alice. This is Elena. Yes.

199
00:16:58,590 --> 00:16:59,970
A Jan is just

200
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:05,910
A comment a hello yeah. Now, thank you
very much for showing the preliminary

201
00:17:05,910 --> 00:17:12,660
results. It just mentioned that we go on
on that work and that our conclusions for

202
00:17:12,660 --> 00:17:18,600
the moment risk and change. So, should be
accommodated for from our point of view.

203
00:17:19,980 --> 00:17:26,940
E the data should be a compact object that
cannot have the size of a molecular

204
00:17:26,940 --> 00:17:34,680
estate, even if they are doing much more
work with the Angelus posse D'Alessandro a

205
00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:39,090
and Carlos I got on gentlemen, Johnny
trying to introduce our support

206
00:17:39,090 --> 00:17:45,540
Coalition's in the case of a molecular
just to check if in that case, a molecular

207
00:17:45,540 --> 00:17:50,970
approach could be possible, but our a
resource for the moment say that no, is a

208
00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:53,220
Ataturk. So thank you.

209
00:17:54,630 --> 00:17:56,130
All right. Thank you.

210
00:17:57,900 --> 00:18:00,000
That's good to hear. And of course, we
look forward to that.

211
00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:06,270
finalization of that result? Now, we have
one other question from washing.

212
00:18:07,500 --> 00:18:11,550
Yes. So, still mean probably this question
to the Elena

213
00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:17,280
I mean, since you say that your
calculation removal calculation is forever

214
00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:20,430
The Pew hydronic a molecule of the x,

215
00:18:21,870 --> 00:18:27,360
how can you also get get some information
how much of the ammonium components you

216
00:18:27,360 --> 00:18:30,120
can you can you can have from for your
calculation,

217
00:18:31,350 --> 00:18:31,650
you

218
00:18:33,300 --> 00:18:34,470
need to state right

219
00:18:35,550 --> 00:18:42,090
is that in our calculation, which is
extremely simple, we will take a cross

220
00:18:42,090 --> 00:18:48,570
section that can be calculated based on
the binding energy and the size of the of

221
00:18:48,570 --> 00:18:56,730
the object. In that case, you will have a
interaction, a cross section for all of

222
00:18:56,730 --> 00:18:59,430
the Communist states that would depend

223
00:19:00,570 --> 00:19:07,920
debating energy and geometrical cross
section in the case of a boss at the truck

224
00:19:07,920 --> 00:19:14,940
park or a molecular estate a for the
predicts, you will have a positive

225
00:19:14,940 --> 00:19:20,820
interaction the interaction that goes like
the geometric data section in that case

226
00:19:20,850 --> 00:19:28,200
they have a molecule that is much a too
large. So, it would disappear at the mean

227
00:19:28,260 --> 00:19:32,490
multiplicity which coincides with a
minimum bias a BP

228
00:19:33,510 --> 00:19:39,060
because of this, you cannot have this a
experimental behavior. I don't know if I

229
00:19:39,060 --> 00:19:41,010
answered your question or not.

230
00:19:42,420 --> 00:19:42,810
Okay.

231
00:19:48,990 --> 00:19:56,460
So now I would open it up to discussions
on any of the four talks so we can have a

232
00:19:56,670 --> 00:20:00,000
couple minutes for general questions and
general discussions. Whether you

233
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:05,850
Have a question specifically for me now or
Nestor or washing or Yana is totally fine.

234
00:20:06,090 --> 00:20:10,830
Or if you have a more general question or
discussion topics that you'd like all of

235
00:20:10,830 --> 00:20:15,510
our speakers to address, please raise your
hand and we'll take them in the order in

236
00:20:15,510 --> 00:20:16,140
which they come.

237
00:20:35,610 --> 00:20:45,720
Maybe have one for Nesta or miss. Sure
good. Hello Nestor. This is Elena a in a

238
00:20:45,720 --> 00:20:52,860
would you is the spoke about the different
MBDA approaches. And you mentioned the

239
00:20:52,890 --> 00:20:59,760
data use a different approaches which
brought on lead

240
00:21:00,359 --> 00:21:09,569
NTT DATA has been used in ebps A that you
that you mentioned that it was use yeah

241
00:21:09,659 --> 00:21:18,119
Mbps 16 as far as I remember the use the
five TV CMOS digits on the also they use

242
00:21:19,320 --> 00:21:24,330
the W sunsets so it's not really
surprising that they are better than then

243
00:21:24,330 --> 00:21:29,250
scitech to reproduce at with data because
they have data lower and

244
00:21:30,330 --> 00:21:36,930
it is the only set that uses energy data.
And all in all, this is like 30 points.

245
00:21:37,920 --> 00:21:44,400
Okay, thank you. Thank you because I was
always curious and I ya know, I'm also

246
00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:51,240
because I know that question had worked
the trying to introduce other ppb data was

247
00:21:51,240 --> 00:21:57,750
there there's the turn by ocean and the
need to introduce the debate out so Han

248
00:21:57,750 --> 00:21:59,970
Pokemon on the I think it was

249
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:09,150
Parking they introduced the no push okay
in mathematics introduced dimensions on

250
00:22:09,150 --> 00:22:17,700
the there is this reanalysis of the of the
car D and one of the digests with the new

251
00:22:17,730 --> 00:22:23,910
data that are much more differential.
Yeah. So they are much more data points

252
00:22:23,910 --> 00:22:26,730
included in these roadways in that I
flashed.

253
00:22:28,380 --> 00:22:29,040
Thank you

254
00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:31,740
very much.

255
00:22:35,550 --> 00:22:39,420
So are there any other questions that we
could discuss today