1
00:00:02,129 --> 00:00:07,439
Yes, yes. And you're decently in full
screen. So can you just try to go to the

2
00:00:07,439 --> 00:00:09,209
next slide to see if it switches?

3
00:00:12,599 --> 00:00:17,999
Yes, perfect. Okay. Okay, great. Thanks.
Thanks for the introduction. First of all,

4
00:00:17,999 --> 00:00:21,929
I'm very glad to present this talk at this
conference and I hope it will be clearing

5
00:00:21,929 --> 00:00:26,699
this for some today I'm going to speak
about the interpretation of Atlas and CMS

6
00:00:26,699 --> 00:00:34,259
measurements is takes us in the ft. So, a
few words about the simplified template

7
00:00:34,289 --> 00:00:41,219
sections. So if access is the form at
which come on the BFS and CMS results are

8
00:00:41,219 --> 00:00:47,669
presented. So they have few advantages. So
they are designed to maximize the

9
00:00:47,669 --> 00:00:52,229
experimental sensitivity and at the same
time, minimize a theoretical uncertainty.

10
00:00:53,999 --> 00:00:59,819
By doing that, I think measurement we can
insulate possible PSM effects because they

11
00:00:59,819 --> 00:01:05,939
are For different models, they are
predicted in different traditional space

12
00:01:05,939 --> 00:01:10,439
regions also suitable for the global
combination of different production

13
00:01:10,439 --> 00:01:14,879
channels and so on. But the limitation is
that they are not fully official and

14
00:01:14,879 --> 00:01:20,789
bursty. And they doesn't take into account
the things they can change. So during

15
00:01:20,789 --> 00:01:26,579
round one, we use so called stage one and
stage measurements, which are only

16
00:01:26,579 --> 00:01:32,639
reference to the production mode. Well,
further onto we also introduce additional

17
00:01:32,639 --> 00:01:39,269
kinematic bands. So this is so called
stage one. And the whole idea is that we

18
00:01:39,269 --> 00:01:45,959
can have by analyzing the whole random
data set with all the kitchen production

19
00:01:46,139 --> 00:01:52,739
channels we can to get access to the
information, the ultimate it's been really

20
00:01:53,129 --> 00:01:59,999
nice to access the transcript. So just an
example here is the measurements of this

21
00:01:59,999 --> 00:02:06,179
TMS for leptin analysis. So, there is a
stage stage one results with a lot of

22
00:02:06,749 --> 00:02:12,209
different things actually, in this
particular example 22 different states or

23
00:02:12,209 --> 00:02:16,559
stage one bins, representative and
production modes, different number of

24
00:02:16,559 --> 00:02:21,989
chests that transfer momentum and so on.
So, yeah, by measuring all this stuff, we

25
00:02:21,989 --> 00:02:26,939
can proceed with the interpretation of
this results. Sure, surely quite

26
00:02:26,939 --> 00:02:31,949
straightforward. And for more details
about these measurements for different

27
00:02:31,949 --> 00:02:38,489
calibration and analysis, the result can
be found in the talks by William Stephen.

28
00:02:39,419 --> 00:02:48,089
Tuesday and Firstly, secondly, so, we'll
proceed to the ft. So, the effectual

29
00:02:48,179 --> 00:02:54,809
effective field theory is quite useful
theoretical instrument for interpretating

30
00:02:55,019 --> 00:03:00,449
effects as measured measurements. So, we
can consider the effect differential Which

31
00:03:00,449 --> 00:03:10,529
is supplemented by new operators of higher
dimensional vectors. So, here the

32
00:03:10,529 --> 00:03:16,109
operators themselves to see is division
for some coefficients and considering the

33
00:03:16,109 --> 00:03:21,599
cross section parameterization we can I
can express it like Standard Model cross

34
00:03:21,599 --> 00:03:28,169
section plus the interference term soco
linear term and the pure bsm contribution

35
00:03:28,169 --> 00:03:32,879
which is referred to as a quadratic and by
destructing the ratio to the standard

36
00:03:32,879 --> 00:03:39,899
model can obtain the parameterization like
this in which eight MBR partitions are not

37
00:03:40,409 --> 00:03:46,289
dependent on the definitions themselves
and they're determined from the MonteCarlo

38
00:03:46,289 --> 00:03:52,649
simulation and this is actually used in
the analysis by doing the attentive

39
00:03:52,649 --> 00:03:59,219
prediction. Okay few words about the basis
so considering the effective for grand

40
00:03:59,219 --> 00:04:08,249
chance, we can Perform, we can present the
results in by several different ways. So,

41
00:04:08,249 --> 00:04:12,929
the complete and non redundant set of
higher dimensional operators of the

42
00:04:13,139 --> 00:04:19,139
particular location from so called EFT
basis. So for example, and considering the

43
00:04:19,139 --> 00:04:26,879
expected for graduation, we can see a part
of CIP evaluating the breeders good fit

44
00:04:26,879 --> 00:04:34,559
here, and the 50 phases, one of the basics
expect for Crimson coats the seal phases

45
00:04:34,919 --> 00:04:40,949
are considering semi empty Lagrangian, and
there's also basis spaces and several

46
00:04:41,039 --> 00:04:47,519
others. So, things that underlying this
slide are actually used in the analysis

47
00:04:47,519 --> 00:04:53,519
I'm going to present today and, in some
cases, it is necessary to use only a

48
00:04:53,519 --> 00:04:59,039
subset of few operators for example, as
usually done in the HPD interaction

49
00:04:59,039 --> 00:04:59,669
studies.

50
00:05:00,989 --> 00:05:07,289
So this is an effective from the dude
usually used by the CMS in their analysis

51
00:05:07,289 --> 00:05:12,359
and they're only several operators but
they parameterize whole PHP interactions

52
00:05:13,139 --> 00:05:19,529
concerning the leading in terms of the
separators. Okay, so moving to the

53
00:05:19,529 --> 00:05:25,229
results, there is a nice set of results
and with the run to data, and first of

54
00:05:25,229 --> 00:05:30,419
all, we have a bunch of results related to
the DB channel measurements from Atlas.

55
00:05:30,419 --> 00:05:37,349
So, here is the first analysis which we
use the 18% the burn of the run to data.

56
00:05:38,099 --> 00:05:46,919
So, we measure the stakes cross sections
over different bits of the

57
00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:53,040
transfer momentum of your emotions. So

58
00:05:54,690 --> 00:06:00,660
after that we interpret them in the terms
of basis is always the operator symbols

59
00:06:00,660 --> 00:06:05,700
and coefficients. And on the table on the
right, we can see the update expected and

60
00:06:05,700 --> 00:06:12,000
observed limits, they awesome petitions.
So the first row correspond to the linear

61
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:18,750
plus quadratic terms. And while the second
one respond only to linear term, I mean

62
00:06:18,750 --> 00:06:23,790
the interference plus the European
contribution. So you can see what's the

63
00:06:23,790 --> 00:06:29,550
difference between them. And that's what
we have for the 18 versus the band. But

64
00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:37,290
this point, we didn't see any disagreement
with the standard model. This analysis was

65
00:06:37,290 --> 00:06:42,840
riddled with the whole run to dataset,
just this slide. So it's now on how big

66
00:06:42,840 --> 00:06:48,000
now 39% above by adding additional
statistics were increased the most

67
00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:55,020
interesting category, utter hate transfers
momentum, and then I'll perform DFT

68
00:06:55,020 --> 00:07:00,000
interpretation in terms of where somebody
is. So we have different operators defined

69
00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:07,170
coefficients and the very new results
which are only approved this week

70
00:07:07,860 --> 00:07:14,340
concerning the linear and linear plus
quadratic limitations on the boson

71
00:07:14,340 --> 00:07:19,650
coefficients. And again, nothing is
there's no deviation from the Standard

72
00:07:19,650 --> 00:07:25,770
Model, observe this point of view. So
there is another set of these

73
00:07:25,770 --> 00:07:32,940
measurements. But more interesting in
terms of PSM search, this is a boosted HPP

74
00:07:32,940 --> 00:07:38,850
analysis. Again, they assess the
associated present production came to BP.

75
00:07:39,420 --> 00:07:46,800
In this analysis, we have additional dance
with higher transfers momentum, and again

76
00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:53,040
using the personal basis on the
interpretation, and that's great, but you

77
00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:57,720
can see the limits are updated again
critical linear and linear quadratic

78
00:07:57,990 --> 00:08:06,420
hypothesis. Again, results are in
agreement with this time. The results of

79
00:08:06,420 --> 00:08:13,920
this previous analysis will be published
very soon, the whole papers Okay, moving

80
00:08:13,920 --> 00:08:19,620
to the 15 measurements and for letson
channel There is also set of nice new

81
00:08:19,620 --> 00:08:28,500
results from Atlas consulting for left and
final state. So, in this case, again using

82
00:08:28,530 --> 00:08:36,930
the same EFT formalism so there's a list
of operators in this case, we're not

83
00:08:36,930 --> 00:08:42,960
considered only sip even as previously but
also CP up and using the quadratic terms

84
00:08:43,410 --> 00:08:48,240
taking into account as well. On the left
bar, you can see how the acceptance

85
00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:54,600
correction modifies the scans or the test
statistics. So the acceptance corrections

86
00:08:54,600 --> 00:09:00,720
quite significant in this analysis and on
the center part, you can see Difference

87
00:09:00,720 --> 00:09:02,610
between expected and observed

88
00:09:03,959 --> 00:09:07,229
considering one particular city operators

89
00:09:08,639 --> 00:09:15,449
here's the two dimensional scans over
Boston coefficients. So the center you see

90
00:09:15,449 --> 00:09:22,889
to the bus, it's kind of strange shapes,
but this strangeness appears again due to

91
00:09:22,889 --> 00:09:31,139
the acceptance corrections which as I said
is quite significant. But this this table

92
00:09:31,139 --> 00:09:39,059
you can see the observed best fit for all
these six cases and the details. Again,

93
00:09:39,089 --> 00:09:44,819
everything is expensive in this data
model. Also, there is a set of one

94
00:09:44,819 --> 00:09:52,949
dimensional IDs assuming all others, yes
and parameters are fixed to zero. So yeah,

95
00:09:53,039 --> 00:10:00,509
there is a setup for us given and secure
payments on the most efficient and Again

96
00:10:00,509 --> 00:10:04,589
everything is in agreement with the
Standard Model, no deviation is observed.

97
00:10:06,509 --> 00:10:10,319
Okay moving to the combine CMS
measurements which Trenton already

98
00:10:10,319 --> 00:10:15,419
mentioned. So, there was a set of signal
strength measurement of the different

99
00:10:15,419 --> 00:10:22,199
production mode and decay modes. We use
the effects engine in order to

100
00:10:22,199 --> 00:10:31,079
parameterize and search for possible
physics. So, here is the combined combined

101
00:10:31,079 --> 00:10:36,719
plot with the production mode, the
horizontal axis and the became out of the

102
00:10:36,719 --> 00:10:42,569
vertical axis estimate sigma straights,
which, again in agreement with a standard

103
00:10:42,569 --> 00:10:49,469
model. Yeah, and here's the
interpretation. So, the strong part would

104
00:10:49,469 --> 00:10:56,309
be parameter values and there's exact
numbers. So, in the first row of results

105
00:10:56,309 --> 00:11:02,189
correspond to the high profile scans.
While not Albeit two parameters are

106
00:11:03,599 --> 00:11:09,299
varying simultaneously well in the second
column, we have only varying one ESM

107
00:11:09,299 --> 00:11:15,599
parameter and and others seem to be fixed
to the standard model and so, in this case

108
00:11:15,629 --> 00:11:22,619
only CPR in terms are taking into account
your parameters are neglected, because

109
00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:27,719
they are not presented to each other and
the quadratic terms are all submitted and

110
00:11:27,719 --> 00:11:33,329
the assumed to be small. So, again in this
case no deviation from Assam is observed

111
00:11:33,569 --> 00:11:40,919
in a nice and consistent hassle moving
forward. There was two measurements in the

112
00:11:40,919 --> 00:11:48,329
gamma gamma channel from Atlas. So, the
was the differential visual cross section

113
00:11:48,329 --> 00:11:52,799
measurements and for the for the
interpretation use the differential

114
00:11:52,799 --> 00:11:57,629
perspective cross section information. The
interpretation was done in two phases on

115
00:11:57,629 --> 00:12:04,409
the scope formulation The second one is
Send me a bit different parameters and

116
00:12:04,409 --> 00:12:11,909
consider we consider CPU and efficiency
yet. So on the left side you see the two

117
00:12:11,939 --> 00:12:19,979
dimensional scans, which reps are by using
the differential resections. And then the

118
00:12:19,979 --> 00:12:25,469
remember this model here is actually the
differential cross section because you for

119
00:12:25,469 --> 00:12:30,749
the interpretation, so it's two transfers
momentum, gamma gamma, and we can check

120
00:12:31,259 --> 00:12:37,799
the agent mass, the number of jets and
those the fire gj. And here is the one

121
00:12:37,799 --> 00:12:45,509
dimensional scans in corresponding to
different basis. So everything is nice in

122
00:12:45,509 --> 00:12:52,889
terms of agreement with the Standard
Model, so we get nice limits to basis. And

123
00:12:52,889 --> 00:12:58,799
last point I'm going to mention is that
the total measurement from CMS which was

124
00:12:58,799 --> 00:13:05,519
combined with it For TMS analysis, we are
considering the gf VP of production. In

125
00:13:05,519 --> 00:13:12,449
this case, we're using the effective
amplitude in order to parameterize the HIV

126
00:13:12,449 --> 00:13:19,499
interactions. So, there is a supplementary
plot for considering different analysis,

127
00:13:19,499 --> 00:13:27,179
combine them all together and see the
actually the various of the DSM, the

128
00:13:27,179 --> 00:13:33,719
assemble some captions, limitations for
that. So by performing these steps, help

129
00:13:33,719 --> 00:13:40,469
us express an analysis, get the observed
and expected limits on the extra effective

130
00:13:40,469 --> 00:13:49,259
cross section. And by interpreting them,
we just got the limits on the parameters

131
00:13:49,319 --> 00:13:54,449
of these given unsecured bsm infection,
and also the face of this particular

132
00:13:54,449 --> 00:14:01,619
issue. Again, yeah, just as I mentioned
again, Everything is an agreement.

133
00:14:03,689 --> 00:14:10,289
So we have a bunch of new results, new
interpretation results. So we got a lot

134
00:14:10,289 --> 00:14:16,529
of, we get more more strict limits on the
Wilson coefficients in different bases,

135
00:14:16,529 --> 00:14:22,619
different production indicate channels, we
do perform good job and noise abatement

136
00:14:22,679 --> 00:14:27,959
and everything. From the point of view,
everything that we see now is very good

137
00:14:27,959 --> 00:14:33,359
agreement and the standard model. So right
now there is nothing there is no traces of

138
00:14:33,359 --> 00:14:38,159
any discrepancy. But we hope that in the
nearest future, we'll see something

139
00:14:38,219 --> 00:14:38,669
exciting.

140
00:14:40,110 --> 00:14:42,600
That's it. That's all from our brain.
Excellent.

141
00:14:43,830 --> 00:14:48,690
Thanks a lot, Nikita for the store
closures kind of the experimental side of

142
00:14:48,690 --> 00:14:52,680
our session and time for question. There
is one from Giovanni

143
00:14:55,200 --> 00:15:02,520
Yes, I said In fact, three but actually
related questions on the To give you bar

144
00:15:02,550 --> 00:15:09,810
EFT fits. So first Are you fitting the
parameters one at a time or soon as

145
00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:11,700
possible? Yes yes

146
00:15:11,700 --> 00:15:12,540
one at a time.

147
00:15:13,170 --> 00:15:22,230
Then you're doing both linear and linear
plus quadratic but the parameterization is

148
00:15:22,230 --> 00:15:32,730
extracted with just interference or also
with the the, the quadratic term even in

149
00:15:32,730 --> 00:15:36,900
the in the model for similar when you
compute them,

150
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:41,820
so all for the linear we only use the
interference term Well, for the linear

151
00:15:41,850 --> 00:15:47,940
plus quadratic, we also include the the
next term, just proportional to one to

152
00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:51,420
four degree. Okay?

153
00:15:52,290 --> 00:16:00,690
And then I will only be syncing wersal
basis. Open it also changed Some of those

154
00:16:00,690 --> 00:16:02,430
operators also probably changed.

155
00:16:03,510 --> 00:16:04,890
Also things that are not

156
00:16:07,259 --> 00:16:14,549
these only changed the Higgs couplings, or
they would potentially also change. Any

157
00:16:14,549 --> 00:16:19,949
electroweak coupling and class also
potentially the backgrounds is CBH BB,

158
00:16:20,069 --> 00:16:25,049
some of them to mean you use at least
tapes from the gondola. So,

159
00:16:25,199 --> 00:16:31,589
yeah, that's very good question. I
actually I can speak for example for ch

160
00:16:31,589 --> 00:16:39,269
web, which in prolactin case in this
modifies a bit these is good ground. But

161
00:16:39,359 --> 00:16:45,059
there was an estimation concerning the
range of the parameters we try to use, so

162
00:16:45,059 --> 00:16:47,459
this shouldn't be taken into account.

163
00:16:48,930 --> 00:16:49,890
That's a

164
00:16:49,890 --> 00:16:50,520
good question.

165
00:16:53,580 --> 00:16:57,480
But just to be clear, the current result
only consider modification to the

166
00:16:57,480 --> 00:17:00,480
explanation Yes.

167
00:17:05,580 --> 00:17:11,220
Oh at least I can speak for for 10
analysis for the BB which

168
00:17:12,539 --> 00:17:17,969
I think is the same but just better to
double check. I was speaking for the BB

169
00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:23,370
Okay, more time for questions

170
00:17:30,630 --> 00:17:32,580
okay if not