1
00:00:02,610 --> 00:00:03,630
Can you see my slides?

2
00:00:04,350 --> 00:00:05,550
Yes. Okay.

3
00:00:06,629 --> 00:00:11,909
Okay. Good afternoon everybody on this
presentation, I will talk about the ex

4
00:00:11,909 --> 00:00:17,369
differential measurements for adolescent
CMS. So, all the measurements that we

5
00:00:17,369 --> 00:00:22,979
present later are fiducial sections. So,
let me introduce this concept here. So,

6
00:00:23,009 --> 00:00:27,539
traditional cross section, our cross
section defining a fiducial face space,

7
00:00:27,779 --> 00:00:33,689
which is a kind of reduced phase space
based on areola analysis and the detector

8
00:00:33,689 --> 00:00:38,939
acceptance. So, we apply some cut cuts
through to level in order to minimize the

9
00:00:38,939 --> 00:00:44,609
extrapolation effect in our analysis and
this you can visualize this here in this

10
00:00:44,729 --> 00:00:49,349
sketch on the right following this
assumption, the visual cross section of

11
00:00:49,349 --> 00:00:54,569
the most modern independent way to measure
Hicks interaction Elysee, but of course,

12
00:00:54,599 --> 00:00:58,229
they come with some limitation for
example, if you want to combine two more

13
00:00:58,229 --> 00:01:03,119
channels, you need to include
extrapolation to a common Face Face, and

14
00:01:03,119 --> 00:01:08,759
that also some assumption of the potential
issue. The kind of quantities that we

15
00:01:08,759 --> 00:01:14,099
unfolded, let's see are related to the
Higgs boson kinematics in production the

16
00:01:14,099 --> 00:01:20,789
key variable is the jet produced in
association with the Higgs and mixture of

17
00:01:21,089 --> 00:01:29,669
ex kinematics and jets. So, when this
level to present the analysis flow, just

18
00:01:29,699 --> 00:01:34,469
more or less control the measurements that
are present later. So the first step is

19
00:01:34,469 --> 00:01:38,489
you identify reconstruct a quantity that
normally is linked with one to one with

20
00:01:38,489 --> 00:01:44,879
the variable that you want to follow them.
So you have to define your meaning, which

21
00:01:44,879 --> 00:01:50,189
is normally based on an expected number of
events or directory solution. Then you

22
00:01:50,189 --> 00:01:56,519
have a step called unfolding where we
collect our data for our detector effect

23
00:01:56,519 --> 00:02:03,179
like resolution and efficiency And then we
have an observable that we use in order to

24
00:02:03,179 --> 00:02:07,949
extract a number of sigonella background
events. After that, we have our own for

25
00:02:07,949 --> 00:02:14,459
the cross section on top of this and for
the results, we do our interpretations. So

26
00:02:14,459 --> 00:02:18,479
let me start with the first channel. So
next for lepton funnel state is the only

27
00:02:18,479 --> 00:02:23,669
channel that we have today for both
experiments 114 versus one to one. And

28
00:02:23,669 --> 00:02:30,149
that was just released recently a paper
with the legacy paper referred to as we

29
00:02:30,149 --> 00:02:34,319
presented before, this channel as a very
well known properties. For example, a

30
00:02:34,319 --> 00:02:41,099
political structure will find a state very
high so it'll be around the Higgs peak. It

31
00:02:41,099 --> 00:02:44,279
does an excellent Nvidia muscle
resolution. As you can see, in these two

32
00:02:44,279 --> 00:02:49,259
blocks, we have a very nice narrow peak on
top of a flat background. And the dominant

33
00:02:49,259 --> 00:02:55,889
background for this channel is the Z
production mainly through Q and it's

34
00:02:55,889 --> 00:03:00,989
estimated using the multi Garibaldi in
case of CMS In a mixture of data

35
00:03:00,989 --> 00:03:09,209
assignment and MonteCarlo for Atlas the
first measurement that I want to present

36
00:03:09,209 --> 00:03:12,839
here is the expected differential cross
section, which is one of the most

37
00:03:12,839 --> 00:03:18,089
important variables that we can
investigate. Let's see, because it's a

38
00:03:18,089 --> 00:03:24,599
really nice variable in order to probe the
global English, we'll know fusion loop in

39
00:03:24,599 --> 00:03:30,569
production, and we can distinguish to
let's say, pata region, the very high PT

40
00:03:30,569 --> 00:03:36,269
region, which is very such can be
sensitive to any additional particles can

41
00:03:36,269 --> 00:03:41,819
join the rule official loop, but of
course, this particular region is not very

42
00:03:42,329 --> 00:03:47,129
interesting index for leptons due to the
statistics. And then we have the low

43
00:03:47,129 --> 00:03:54,329
Piketty journal, it's a below 30 gV Where
are these this particular face pace is

44
00:03:54,329 --> 00:04:00,359
sensitive to the Yuka gobbling to the
Quark BNC and the extra leptin says Very

45
00:04:00,359 --> 00:04:08,039
stronger power to to this particular face
base. Here you can see the results on the

46
00:04:08,039 --> 00:04:13,199
left for Atlas on the right for gem So,
you can see the black dots that are our

47
00:04:13,229 --> 00:04:17,129
measurements compared to the Standard
Model prediction and you can see the

48
00:04:17,189 --> 00:04:22,889
overall there is a very nice agreement
with the multilateral expectation sorry

49
00:04:22,889 --> 00:04:29,159
with the funder model prediction of loss
in the citizen paper also provides an

50
00:04:29,159 --> 00:04:34,079
interpretation of the treaty spectrum as a
function of Kappa bigger policy. And if

51
00:04:34,079 --> 00:04:38,339
you go to consider the most modern
inventor shanaar you just considering the

52
00:04:38,339 --> 00:04:42,899
shape it is distortion as a function of
these two parameters, we can put an upper

53
00:04:42,899 --> 00:04:50,759
limit at the level of plus or minus to
Alpha Kappa see. other variables that we

54
00:04:50,759 --> 00:04:55,049
can measure index over laptops are for
example, and three four, which is the most

55
00:04:55,049 --> 00:04:59,339
of the sub leading pair. It's a very
important variable of issue consider that

56
00:04:59,339 --> 00:05:03,089
too many people So contribution can
distort, distort this

57
00:05:04,710 --> 00:05:09,840
distribution. For example, we know that
some HDL graders can affect this

58
00:05:09,840 --> 00:05:13,710
particular variable. But at the same time,
we are also starting to be sensitive to

59
00:05:13,710 --> 00:05:17,820
some effects predicted by the Standard
Model, for example, final state

60
00:05:17,820 --> 00:05:19,530
interference in the

61
00:05:19,740 --> 00:05:20,520
44 new.

62
00:05:21,900 --> 00:05:26,070
Here on the left, you can see the results
for mt four and you can see that it's a

63
00:05:26,070 --> 00:05:31,410
very nice agreement with the center model
on there, I thought there is another very

64
00:05:31,410 --> 00:05:37,230
important variable which is number of jets
for CMS. This variable is very important

65
00:05:37,260 --> 00:05:40,860
because it's very sensitive to the
production well composition is used a lot

66
00:05:40,860 --> 00:05:46,050
in our multivariate analysis to
distinguish the production model and

67
00:05:46,050 --> 00:05:53,340
senior versus background that is also
sensitive to the actual image. With

68
00:05:53,340 --> 00:05:59,160
increased luminosity, we are also able to
push even more than double the federal

69
00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:03,180
psychosexual From here we can see an
example of two of them on the left we have

70
00:06:03,660 --> 00:06:09,150
a number of jets and the right to
diversity stability in all of them sorry I

71
00:06:09,150 --> 00:06:12,510
didn't mention before but for all these
measurements next for laptops is still

72
00:06:12,510 --> 00:06:18,030
statistically dominated so they get an
order this mainly limited by the

73
00:06:18,030 --> 00:06:22,860
statistics on the with the ram three and
later with a luminosity we'll be able to

74
00:06:22,860 --> 00:06:27,210
push even more granularity to this
measurement something that he doesn't

75
00:06:27,210 --> 00:06:29,670
fully limit which is our detector
resolution.

76
00:06:33,300 --> 00:06:36,180
No gamma which is

77
00:06:37,470 --> 00:06:41,370
seven shot channel I want to present today
for this channel we have results for

78
00:06:41,370 --> 00:06:48,750
another set 114% have been for CMS 36.
What so this channel is fleeting

79
00:06:48,750 --> 00:06:53,340
extractable from a state but lower a
server be compared to different laptop

80
00:06:53,340 --> 00:06:58,380
from a state. It is also very excellent.
What a monster resolution on the level of

81
00:06:58,380 --> 00:07:02,910
one 2% and the next beige background is
they want to know gamma gamma production

82
00:07:02,910 --> 00:07:12,960
which is estimated from the data side and
the other kind of analytic fit. Here I

83
00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:18,510
want to present the results for x gamma
gamma on the left you have the expected

84
00:07:18,510 --> 00:07:23,820
distribution of 140 investment to bond for
others. On the right you have the number

85
00:07:23,820 --> 00:07:29,700
of digits for CMS a 36 inverse font, but
now you can see there is a good agreement

86
00:07:29,730 --> 00:07:35,700
between for both measurements in both
experiments. We don't see any significant

87
00:07:35,700 --> 00:07:39,870
deviation with respect to the standard
model but important to say they also even

88
00:07:39,870 --> 00:07:44,490
if we wonder 14 restaurant of biotics for
gamma gamma is also dominated by

89
00:07:44,490 --> 00:07:49,560
statistical uncertainty so to increase the
luminosity, we'll put salaat to this

90
00:07:49,560 --> 00:07:54,840
channel in order to improve the
measurements. Others provide also the

91
00:07:54,840 --> 00:08:00,270
interpretation of cap of the PT
distribution as a functional capacity. V

92
00:08:00,630 --> 00:08:05,310
and the V e take into account to the most
model independent shannara we're just

93
00:08:05,310 --> 00:08:11,190
considering the distortion a function is
too complex we can put an upper limit at

94
00:08:11,190 --> 00:08:20,280
the level plus or minus 20 units in
capacity and 95% confidence level. Others

95
00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:26,280
did also nifty interpretation of future
cross sectional material try to

96
00:08:26,310 --> 00:08:32,430
constraints with so coefficient of
operator dimensional six using five

97
00:08:32,430 --> 00:08:37,260
observables at number of jets and the
properties already mentioned before why

98
00:08:37,260 --> 00:08:44,430
they're important mgg which is important
to announce to the VBA for GMO data for j

99
00:08:44,430 --> 00:08:50,490
which is a CP sensitive variable and
leading GPT which is which provides

100
00:08:50,520 --> 00:08:56,160
complimentary information to PT a number
of jets. Here on the right you have the

101
00:08:56,160 --> 00:08:59,970
eight couplings that have been
investigated in summary brought to justice

102
00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:04,710
See that when you have on the x axis equal
to zero is the standard model. As you can

103
00:09:04,710 --> 00:09:10,260
see all the upper limit that we can put on
these parameters are well consistent with

104
00:09:10,260 --> 00:09:16,230
the Standard Model assumption. This plot
is made basically fitting one coefficient

105
00:09:16,380 --> 00:09:21,450
at a time as setting the other efficient
to zero. And then we will have more

106
00:09:21,450 --> 00:09:29,370
details on the talk on Friday by Nikita.
The last channel that I want to mention is

107
00:09:29,430 --> 00:09:35,160
next to ww for this channel, we have just
a measurement from CMS 114. That's

108
00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:40,590
rentable. The property of this channel
sought a lot of adventure issue compared

109
00:09:40,590 --> 00:09:45,150
to gamma gamma z, but the fun of cities
not fully constructible due to the

110
00:09:45,150 --> 00:09:51,840
presence of neutrinos. And the main
background for these channels are WWDC,

111
00:09:51,840 --> 00:09:56,490
but production where the ships are
evaluated the MonteCarlo and the overall

112
00:09:56,490 --> 00:09:59,970
normalization of the Babylon the
statements from data one through eight

113
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:11,040
Let's see, I must provide two measurements
one was using the x two w w, the PT of the

114
00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:14,760
Higgs on the left and the number of the
Jets from the right as you can see, in

115
00:10:14,850 --> 00:10:21,000
both cases, we have a very good agreement
with the Standard Model expectation, just

116
00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:26,370
to mention a small difference with respect
to gamma, gamma and z in this particular

117
00:10:26,370 --> 00:10:32,160
channel, we there is a two dimensional fit
in each bin of the distribution, whether

118
00:10:32,220 --> 00:10:38,400
it is transfer mass versus muscle
developed system in order to announce the

119
00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:44,610
separation between a signal background.
And then as you can see, the granularity

120
00:10:44,610 --> 00:10:50,940
of the PT distribution is not so fine like
gamma gamma z given the lower resolution

121
00:10:50,940 --> 00:10:55,680
in PT, and also the higher background but
it's very important to notice that this

122
00:10:55,680 --> 00:11:00,450
channel at the very high PT so let's say
about 200, gv, and the very high jet

123
00:11:00,450 --> 00:11:06,810
multiplicity above three gv sorry about
above three jets, it's very competitive

124
00:11:06,870 --> 00:11:11,070
with a gamma gamma. So, this channel will
have very important weight

125
00:11:11,580 --> 00:11:13,110
and the final combination

126
00:11:17,250 --> 00:11:23,070
now let's move to the bank differential
section. So, as I said before in order to

127
00:11:23,070 --> 00:11:27,240
combine the two or more channels we need
to accept it Come on face to face it

128
00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:31,830
normally is considered the full face pace.
This means that we need to add some other

129
00:11:31,830 --> 00:11:38,820
less some assumption and also we increase
our 2d uncertainties with respect to the

130
00:11:38,820 --> 00:11:43,620
future cross section measurements will be
we need also to take into account for the

131
00:11:43,620 --> 00:11:49,110
uncertainties and adventure issue itself.
Here on the left we have the distribution

132
00:11:49,110 --> 00:11:54,660
as a function sorry, the PTT combination
of four outlets when we combine gamma

133
00:11:54,660 --> 00:12:00,000
gamma zz using a C with one on the fourth
inverse Phantom or there is a variable

134
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:03,510
consecutive months with a standard model
that we value especially high at the level

135
00:12:03,510 --> 00:12:11,580
of 80% of the central plot, we have the
CMS distribution of 36%. But when the

136
00:12:11,580 --> 00:12:17,070
combination is done using a gamma, gamma z
and x to be the bar, you can see some

137
00:12:17,220 --> 00:12:22,140
contribution to the bar in the very high
density region. And then here on the right

138
00:12:22,170 --> 00:12:30,210
the interpretation of the distribution
using the ship distortion adventure ratio

139
00:12:30,210 --> 00:12:34,470
effects. And you can see all these
measurements are very compatible with the

140
00:12:34,470 --> 00:12:42,180
Standard Model prediction. Just to
conclude the So, we have already several

141
00:12:42,180 --> 00:12:48,270
differential resection of the Higgs boson
performed by other CMS, all of them are

142
00:12:48,270 --> 00:12:53,190
still statistically dominated. We observe
a very good agreement between the Standard

143
00:12:53,190 --> 00:12:59,700
Model prediction and experimental results
is confirmed also with our interpretation

144
00:12:59,700 --> 00:13:04,620
on top According to the results, and still
many new results with the full on two data

145
00:13:04,620 --> 00:13:08,730
set to come, so please stay tuned them.
Thanks a lot.

146
00:13:15,420 --> 00:13:22,620
Thank you for this quite comprehensive set
of results. So let's take questions from

147
00:13:22,620 --> 00:13:23,280
the audience.

148
00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:46,590
So I don't I don't see any questions, so
maybe I can take the chance to ask one.

149
00:13:47,550 --> 00:13:56,940
When you talk about the fact that the data
statistics limit the been with us in these

150
00:13:56,940 --> 00:14:04,500
quantities, do you have a feeling at which
time labor's it's not needed anymore to to

151
00:14:04,500 --> 00:14:13,440
go to find out means to test to see at
least the more widely known coupling

152
00:14:13,470 --> 00:14:19,920
deviations matter which level is it it's
not worth any more to go in find out

153
00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:25,530
meanings phrases for the single by single
differential cross section and then it's

154
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:31,110
it's rather it takes more importance to
move to to double differential

155
00:14:31,110 --> 00:14:31,830
measurements.

156
00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:34,950
So for example

157
00:14:36,809 --> 00:14:37,799
okay she wants to the

158
00:14:39,630 --> 00:14:46,050
deputy distribution for laptop system
channel for Atlas we already pushed the

159
00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:53,100
inbounder is a lot and we start to have
final billing with stuff also strong

160
00:14:53,100 --> 00:14:58,200
correlation between the various
measurements is something that in

161
00:14:58,200 --> 00:15:06,810
principle you would like to To avoid and
then the on the double differential

162
00:15:06,810 --> 00:15:08,760
variables. Here we are.

163
00:15:10,380 --> 00:15:11,370
Still, I mean,

164
00:15:12,389 --> 00:15:17,159
gamma gamma is less problem with respect
to for laptops. But in general when you

165
00:15:17,159 --> 00:15:23,339
start to increase the number of jets and
you're set to push a lot to the deputy

166
00:15:23,339 --> 00:15:29,279
Ranger you go in very remote face base
we're here just a matter of taking data

167
00:15:29,279 --> 00:15:34,769
because the in some cases we have empty
bins, we just have to put upper limits

168
00:15:34,769 --> 00:15:35,039
there.

169
00:15:39,240 --> 00:15:46,170
Okay, thank you. So I don't see any
additional questions I propose to move on

170
00:15:46,170 --> 00:15:51,480
to the next presentation. That is about
differential theory predictions.